Search Privacy Fines

Browse and filter privacy enforcement fines worldwide.

← Back to Overview

17 fines found

Total: $238K

DateCompanyFineRegulationAuthorityCountryTypeSummary
2019-11-13Social Insurance Agency€50KGDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakia"
https://www.etrend.sk/ekonomika/socialna-poistovna-porusila-gdpr-pokutu-50-tisic...

https://www.etrend.sk/ekonomika/socialna-poistovna-porusila-gdpr-pokutu-50-tisic-eur-nechce-zaplatit.html

Articles: "Art. 32 GDPR

2019-11-13Social Insurance Agency€50KGDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaFailure to implement sufficient measures to ensure information security
--

Articles: Art. 32 GDPR

2019-09-27Slovak Telekom€40KGDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaFailure to implement sufficient measures to ensure information security
--

Articles: Art. 32 GDPR

2021-01-01Unknown€40KGDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaFailure to comply with data processing principles
--

Articles: Art. 5 (1) a) GDPR, Art. 5 (2) GDPR, Art. 28 GDPR

2019-09-27Slovak Telekom€40KGDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaFailure to implement sufficient measures to ensure information security
The data controller did not take the necessary technical measures to prevent a d...

The data controller did not take the necessary technical measures to prevent a data breach. No further details have been disclosed.

Articles: Art. 32 GDPR

2021-01-01Unknown€500GDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaNon-cooperation with Data Protection Authority
--

Articles: Art. 31 GDPR

2021-01-01Unknown€100GDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaUnknown
--

Articles: Unknown

1970-01-01Unknwon€0GDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaFailure to implement sufficient measures to ensure information security
Improper information security measures in place.

Improper information security measures in place.

Articles: Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR, Art. 32 GDPR

--Unknwon€0GDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaFailure to implement sufficient measures to ensure information security
--

Articles: Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR, Art. 32 GDPR

1970-01-01Unknown€0GDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaNon-compliance with subjects' rights protection safeguards
The data controller did not comply with the data subject’s request to access per...

The data controller did not comply with the data subject’s request to access personal data related to audio recordings.

Articles: Art. 15 GDPR

--Unknown€0GDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaNon-compliance with lawful basis for data processing
--

Articles: Art. 5 (1) a) GDPR, Art. 6 (1) a) GDPR

--Unknown€0GDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakia<a href="https://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/32.htm">Art. 32 GDPR</a>
--

Articles: Failure to implement sufficient measures to ensure information security

--Unknown€0GDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaNon-compliance with subjects' rights protection safeguards
--

Articles: Art. 15 GDPR

--Unknown€0GDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaFailure to implement sufficient measures to ensure information security
--

Articles: Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR, Art. 32 GDPR

1970-01-01Unknown€0GDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaArt. 32 GDPR
The data controller didn’t properly impose the necessary security measures neede...

The data controller didn’t properly impose the necessary security measures needed to protect personal data.

Articles: Failure to implement sufficient measures to ensure information security

1970-01-01Unknown€0GDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaFailure to implement sufficient measures to ensure information security
Personal data in the form of documents were thrown to the garbage dump, which is...

Personal data in the form of documents were thrown to the garbage dump, which is an improper method of disposing of such documents.

Articles: Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR, Art. 32 GDPR

1970-01-01Unknown€0GDPRSlovak Data Protection OfficeSlovakiaNon-compliance with lawful basis for data processing
The Data Protection Authority found that the City had published personal data on...

The Data Protection Authority found that the City had published personal data on the official city website in violation of the law, and without asking for the consent of the data subjects. The City had claimed that it was doing this attempting to fulfill the Freedom of Information Act’s premises.

Articles: Art. 5 (1) a) GDPR, Art. 6 (1) a) GDPR